European companies take ESG the most seriously, with 92 per cent of our analysts observing some or all of their companies paying closer attention to ESG-related issues, up from 67 per cent last year. Sentiment appears to have tilted in favour in EMEA/Latin America, with a majority for the first time - 67 per cent of analysts - reporting a greater ESG emphasis among the companies they cover, compared to 46 per cent last year.
But the most notable attitude shift is in China - the number of our analysts reporting a growing ESG focus among some or most of their Chinese companies has nearly doubled to 63 per cent, from just 33 per cent last year. Even quite recently, environmental, social and governance considerations were not high on boardroom agendas across much of corporate China, if they existed at all. However, the growing stream of foreign capital into mainland markets has been accompanied by ever greater scrutiny of companies’ ESG credentials.
“We’re having far more ESG-related conversations with managements as clients, particularly in Europe, demand greater insight into how these businesses are run. It’s clear that for many companies, particularly those founded by first-generation entrepreneurs, the topic had never crossed their mind before,” notes one China consumer analyst.
This has prompted firms to take a closer look at where they can improve - as well as better communicate - the relevant policies and procedures they might already have in place.
“In some cases, companies had low ESG ratings despite adhering to sustainable business practices, simply because managements hadn’t declared them, most importantly to the vendors that collate ESG-related checklists,” adds the analyst.
Policy directives have also helped. In a nationwide ‘war on pollution’ China’s government has encouraged more use of renewables and natural gas in place of coal-fired energy generation, imposed restrictions on vehicle use in major cities, cut excess industrial capacity and even shut-down thousands of heavy polluting factories completely.
Little change in North America
Meanwhile, ESG is failing to gain much momentum among North American companies, according to our analysts. Only 57 per cent of respondents report a growing ESG focus among some or all of their companies, essentially the same as last year. The current administration has not pushed the ESG agenda. In some instances, it's doing quite the opposite, rolling back emissions standards across the energy and vehicle industries and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Minding your own business is not enough
Our survey results show that when it comes to the E and the S, environmental regulations continue to dominate management thinking, and particularly so for the utilities, energy, materials and industrials sectors. However, supply chain management is becoming an increasingly important consideration for companies and is now the most relevant issue for consumer staples firms, according to our analysts.
Consumers, particularly in the developed world, are more aware than ever about the provenance of the products and services they buy; whether workers involved have clean and safe facilities and are paid a living wage, for example. And these consumers are demanding that companies become more responsible, one of Fidelity’s ESG specialists notes.
“The UK passed the Modern Slavery Act in 2015, partly to ensure transparency of supply chains, while Australia passed a similar law at the end of last year. But asset managers also have an important role here, to actively engage with their companies and promote change where required,” he adds.
Companies and brands that do not have adequate insight or control over the quality and business practices of their suppliers, and even their suppliers’ suppliers, can face a very public backlash. Just ask the Spice Girls. The girl band found itself on newspaper front pages for all the wrong reasons recently after it was revealed that the white t-shirts they had been pictured wearing were made in a Bangladeshi factory that paid its staff around https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/20/spice-girls-comic-relief-tshirts-made-bangladesh-factory-paying-staff-35p-an-hour .
High-end goods are not immune either. “Younger generations particularly expect a product to be ‘squeaky clean’ when they pay top dollar for it. This has prompted some high-profile brands to change the way they source crocodile leather, for instance, or stop using it altogether. Burberry has removed all real fur from its products and stopped burning unwanted stock, something it did to protect its brand and ensure such goods weren’t sold at below market prices. It’s promised to reuse, repair, donate or recycle the stock instead,” notes one luxury goods analyst.
As global brands apply more stringent screening criteria and step up plant inspections, suppliers must adapt or lose business. China has long been a pivotal link in the world’s supply chain. “Companies from industries as diverse as electronics, textiles, apparel and toys, have upped their game in recent years in response to pressure from end-retailers and tighter regulations from the Chinese government,” one China consumer analyst notes.
Supply chain management is a prominent issue across the industrial, technology and materials sectors too. Gold and diamond mining have been cleaned up a lot in the last decade or so, but more recently attention has shifted to mining cobalt, an element of the batteries that power smartphones, tablets laptops and electric vehicles.
One materials analyst notes that a shortage of cobalt and rising demand have caused prices to soar, incentivising ’artisanal miners’ - independent operators not officially employed by a mining company. “These miners often operate outside safety regulations and can include children, posing a challenge for high-profile end-users, such as Apple and Microsoft, which want to maintain the integrity and security of their supply chains.”
Utilities well-positioned to benefit from climate change
Almost three quarters of our utilities analysts expect climate change to have a positive impact on their companies over the next 10 years. Firms in the renewables space are obviously well positioned for the energy transition that’s already underway. “Currently, less than 10 per cent of global power generation is through wind and solar sources, which leaves a lot of room for growth,” notes one utilities analyst.
More indirectly, renewables generation requires additional network investment. Instead of one large power plant connected to the grid, multiple points are required to connect typically smaller, more scattered renewable sources. Power generation from renewables can also be more volatile and networks must be equipped to manage bi-directional flows. Meanwhile, as energy transition encourages the electrification of other industries, most notably private transportation, electricity demand will naturally rise, benefiting utilities across the board.
Room for improvement
Overall, our analysts note that pressure from investors, consumers and governments has helped heighten ESG awareness across regions and industries. However, there is still a sizeable minority of laggards; 30 percent of respondents see no discernable shift in their companies’ ESG efforts. It seems a glowing ESG score-card is not yet a priority, or even possible, for everyone.
What question should we tackle next?
Email your suggestion firstname.lastname@example.org
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up so you may get back less than you invest. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
These materials are provided for information purposes only and are intended only for the person or entity to which it is sent.
These materials do not constitute a distribution, an offer or solicitation to engage the investment management services of Fidelity, or an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or investment product.
Fidelity makes no representations that the contents are appropriate for use in all locations or that the transactions or services discussed are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries or by all investors or counterparties.
Investors should also note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon by Fidelity. They are valid only as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice.
This material was created by Fidelity International. It must not be reproduced or circulated to any other party without prior permission of Fidelity.
This communication is not directed at, and must not be acted on by persons inside the United States and is otherwise only directed at persons residing in jurisdictions where the relevant funds are authorised for distribution or where no such authorisation is required. Fidelity is not authorised to manage or distribute investment funds or products in, or to provide investment management or advisory services to persons resident in, mainland China. All persons and entities accessing the information do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and should consult their professional advisers.
This content may contain materials from third-parties which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with any Fidelity entity (Third-Party Content). Fidelity has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content.
Fidelity International refers to the group of companies which form the global investment management organisation that provides products and services in designated jurisdictions outside of North America Fidelity, Fidelity International, the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited. Fidelity only offers information on products and services and does not provide investment advice personal recommendations based on individual circumstances.
Issued in Europe: Issued by FIL Investments International (FCA registered number 122170) a firm authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., authorised and supervised by the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and FIL Investment Switzerland AG, authorised and supervised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA. For German wholesale clients issued by FIL Investment Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus. For German institutional clients issued by FIL Investments International – Niederlassung Frankfurt.
In Hong Kong, this content is issued by FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited and it has not been reviewed by the Securities and Future Commission. FIL Investment Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No: 199006300E) is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Singapore. FIL Asset Management (Korea) Limited is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Korea. In Taiwan, independently operated by FIL Securities (Taiwan ) Limited, 11F, 68 Zhongxiao East Road, Section 5, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan 11065, R.O.C. Customer Service Number: 0800-00-9911#2.
Issued in Australia by Fidelity Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). This material has not been prepared specifically for Australian investors and may contain information which is not prepared in accordance with Australian law.