15 October 2018, 10:53 GMT
The trade war story continues to dominate headlines, given that it is such a marked departure from global norms in recent decades. As it is hard to see the tit-for-tat trade dispute receding anytime soon, it is important to look at how the clash relates to the US electoral cycle and to Trump’s image as ‘deal maker’, as well as the longer-term impact of the conflict on China, which we believe is often overstated.
US politics and tariff decision making
The US electoral cycle remains a key point of reference for the direction of the ‘trade wars’ story. With the US midterm elections edging closer and Republican control of both houses of Congress at stake, it is hardly surprising that Trump wants to project the image of being tough on trade, as he promised in his campaign. As such, it is likely that this rhetoric will continue to escalate at least until November, and if his party is successful, then trade wars are likely here to stay. But the outcome of the midterms will also impact the decision-making processes of China and other US trade partners - will they negotiate, retaliate, or put off these decisions until the presidential elections in 2020?
Trump as ‘deal maker’
Trump appears to view himself as a ‘deal maker’, so it is possible that his ultimate goal is to strike a historic ‘deal’ with China. After years of rhetoric directed towards the US’ NAFTA partners, Canada and Mexico, Trump forced both parties to the table to renegotiate the 1994 agreement. While the verdict is still out on how much Trump really achieved there, he announced it as a ‘truly historic’ new deal, and as evidence of how his tough talk ultimately leads to deal making. In comparison to China, however, Canada and Mexico are far more reliant on US trade, with exports to the US contributing over 20 per cent to Canada’s GDP and 37 per cent to Mexico’s GDP. As a result, they are much more likely to be responsive to US demands.
This raises the question of whether a ‘winning deal’ with China is even possible. China has effectively diversified its trading partners through such programs as its Belt and Road Initiative. With some of its long-term, strategic plans making progress, it is less likely that Trump has the bargaining power he may have had over China 20 years ago.
Staying positive on China
It must be noted that while GDP in China is slowing, this has been driven largely by segments of the economy specifically targeted by the government’s deleveraging efforts, such as infrastructure fixed asset investments. On the positive side, private sector manufacturing activity is increasing, driven by the party’s determination to ensure sufficient funding for Small and Micro Enterprises (SMEs), which will continue to be a key focus for growth moving forward.
The ‘trade wars’ have driven the recent weakness in Chinese equities, particularly in sectors most exposed to US trade, but to put this in context, less than 5 per cent of the MSCI China index revenue share comes from the US. We therefore believe there is a case to be more positive on China.
The return on equity (ROE) growth rate in China is one of the best in Asia and is supported by structural tailwinds: better margins driven by factors such as improving domestic consumption, cost reduction trends, and consolidation in state-owned enterprises.
In addition, after a nearly 25 per cent drop in Chinese equities since January the price-earnings ratio is now below its long-term average. We believe this represents an attractive entry point for investors looking to get back into the market.
Source: Bloomberg, October 2018
Past performance is not a reliable indicator for future results.
The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up so you may get back less than you invest. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
These materials are provided for information purposes only and are intended only for the person or entity to which it is sent.
These materials do not constitute a distribution, an offer or solicitation to engage the investment management services of Fidelity, or an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or investment product.
Fidelity makes no representations that the contents are appropriate for use in all locations or that the transactions or services discussed are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries or by all investors or counterparties.
Investors should also note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon by Fidelity. They are valid only as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice.
This material was created by Fidelity International. It must not be reproduced or circulated to any other party without prior permission of Fidelity.
This communication is not directed at, and must not be acted on by persons inside the United States and is otherwise only directed at persons residing in jurisdictions where the relevant funds are authorised for distribution or where no such authorisation is required. Fidelity is not authorised to manage or distribute investment funds or products in, or to provide investment management or advisory services to persons resident in, mainland China. All persons and entities accessing the information do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and should consult their professional advisers.
This content may contain materials from third-parties which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with any Fidelity entity (Third-Party Content). Fidelity has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content.
Fidelity International refers to the group of companies which form the global investment management organisation that provides products and services in designated jurisdictions outside of North America Fidelity, Fidelity International, the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited. Fidelity only offers information on products and services and does not provide investment advice personal recommendations based on individual circumstances.
Issued in Europe: Issued by FIL Investments International (FCA registered number 122170) a firm authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., authorised and supervised by the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and FIL Investment Switzerland AG, authorised and supervised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA. For German wholesale clients issued by FIL Investment Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus. For German institutional clients issued by FIL Investments International – Niederlassung Frankfurt.
In Hong Kong, this content is issued by FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited and it has not been reviewed by the Securities and Future Commission. FIL Investment Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No: 199006300E) is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Singapore. FIL Asset Management (Korea) Limited is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Korea. In Taiwan, independently operated by FIL Securities (Taiwan ) Limited, 11F, 68 Zhongxiao East Road, Section 5, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan 11065, R.O.C. Customer Service Number: 0800-00-9911#2.
Issued in Australia by Fidelity Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). This material has not been prepared specifically for Australian investors and may contain information which is not prepared in accordance with Australian law.